He has turned this place into nothing but propaganda and a sounding board for his own journalistic opinions. I'm getting sick and tired of reading this article.
Would anyone here like to test their numbers against mine? I am calling any and all of you to task on this. I would also suggest that these material far outstrip child abuse records in sheer number of websites that feature the material. I would suggest these kinds of materials trump "records of child abuse" both in number of files as well as in sheer accumulated data size. Do you want to argue with me about this? Where are you getting your numbers? Would you like to put your numbers to the test? Just as a rough estimation - I would hypothesize that the two largest sources of child pornography material in the world is drawn japanese lolicon plus the material created by the child modelling industry. I could argue that the materials (2) and (3) are more prevalent on the internet than material showing sex acts with men. In some cases the person holding the camera is the child's mother! (3) The thousands of pictures of clothed so-called non-nude models all over the internet where the mother is not only involved but she regularly appears within the frame along with the child. Yes these are also legally classified as child pornography.
(2) Nude modelling photography of children, done in a studio, where the parents are present. Yes those are legally classified as child pornography. (1) Nudist colony photos, often taken by the child's mother. 20:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC) -Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.250.240.114 ( talk) First of all, why is this guy being charged with vandalism? "99.99% of offenders are men" ? Where in the world are you getting that number? That's easily shown to be false. i don't think you could say that it's 99.99%, as there are just no reports that I know of. there's definitely very few reports, and no studies that i've seen that broke down cases. that's just from my exp having a brother as a computer forensics person.
Doc Tropics 18:55, 12 March 2009 (UTC) Theres actually a very sizable number of women charged with CP. Still, thanks for contributing, your effort is appreciated. 217.132.95.133 ( talk) 15:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC) I clearly understand your point however, given that 99.99% of offenders are indeed men, it seems unreasonable to twist the language around to include a minority so small as to be almost non-existant. The word('s) 'men' / 'man' are used in this article in places where it should be written 'offenders' 'people' '(porn)viewers' etc somebody should change the wording here so this article so it isn't biased against men.
0 kommentar(er)
